BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2005 Generalizing wolf effects across the Greater Yellowstone Area: a cautionary note
Robert A. Garrott, Justin A. Gude, Eric J. Bergman, Claire Gower, P. J. White, Kenneth L. Hamlin
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Although numerous authors are investigating indirect effects of wolf recovery, the most fundamental ecological impact of the Greater Yellowstone Area wolf reintroduction, the effects of wolf predation on ungulate populations, remains unclear. We report on a 5-year comparative study of wolf (Canis lupus)–elk (Cervus elaphus) dynamics on an elk herd in the headwaters of the Madison River within Yellowstone National Park and the lower Madison elk herd that winters 40 km downriver outside the Park. A resident pack became established on the Madison headwaters area in 1997 and grew to multiple packs totaling 30–40 animals by 2002. During winter 1999 emigrates from Yellowstone established a pack on the lower Madison area. However, poor recruitment and low adult survival limited wolf population growth, with the area supporting a single pack, never exceeding 5 animals. Wolf kill rates on the lower Madison area were approximately double that documented for the Madison headwaters area. Moderate kill rates in the Madison headwaters, combined with high wolf densities and modest elk densities, resulted in an estimated 20% of the elk population being killed during winter and projections for a declining elk population. In contrast, high kill rates on the lower Madison area, combined with low wolf densities and high elk densities, resulted in winter predation estimates not exceeding 4% of the elk population. We suspect this level of mortality will be of little biological significance with respect to elk population trajectory. These results suggest that the effects of wolf predation on elk populations differ substantially over relatively small spatial scales, depending on a complex suite of interacting factors. Thus, we caution against generalizing the effects of wolf restoration on elk dynamics from any single study and encourage collaborations to develop comparative predator–prey studies that improve our understanding of wolf–ungulate interactions and enhance conservation.

Robert A. Garrott, Justin A. Gude, Eric J. Bergman, Claire Gower, P. J. White, and Kenneth L. Hamlin "Generalizing wolf effects across the Greater Yellowstone Area: a cautionary note," Wildlife Society Bulletin 33(4), 1245-1255, (1 December 2005). https://doi.org/10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[1245:GWEATG]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 December 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
11 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

KEYWORDS
Canis lupus
carnivores
Cervus elaphus
elk
endangered species
predator–prey
wolves
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top